Saturday, July 17, 2010

Initial Essay: In Search of Quality


More than thirty-three years ago Robert Pirsig’s Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance took the American publishing world by storm in 1974. It was an immediate critical and commercial success, sold millions of copies in twenty-three languages, and was described by the London Telegraph as "the most widely read philosophy book, ever." To aging baby boomers who may have missed the book when it first came out, and wearied by neoliberalism and neoconservatism and all the perversions known to man in between the two, it may come as a surprise to know that the book is not much about either Zen or motorcycles. Zen and its 1991 sequel, Lila, are actually novels about a quest to establish the purpose and value of philosophy. Or rather, they are attempts to raid the encampment of philosophy, which has become entrenched in the subject-object dualism of modern rationalism and fortified by the spoils dispensed by universities, government, and economics, to capture its real prize: an orientation that makes sense of the world, makes a difference in how one lives, and does justice to all levels of human nature. These “raids” are carried out as true stories related in a novelistic fashion. Their “quality,” aside from the philosophical meaning this term will have for Pirsig, is therefore at the outset personal, participant, embodied in real people – autobiographical, and in a certain sense also, historical. Both books, but especially the second one, contain striking and thoughtful insights into the nature of the modern project, especially in its American incarnation. I want to focus in particular on how these insights help us to understand our society and why it seems to have such difficulty with the affirmation of moral truths.

But first a general comment. Aside from the business craze for “Total Quality Management” which swept America in the 80’s, and then embarked to Japanese corporations – a craze which may or may not have owed something to Pirsig’s discoveries – I see little evidence in the United States that Pirsig’s Metaphysics of Quality has penetrated into any crevasse of American thinking. His books were immensely popular here, but American literary and professional elites still continue to churn out reams of sociological and “philosophological” (a Pirsig word for something that is not exactly philosophy) commentary that contain the same old eviscerated Cartesian and post-Protestant presumptions which, despite all their varying and even conflicting forms, have basically nothing new to offer. When Americans find themselves in the mood for debate, they can tune in to the same argument that crops up decade after decade: science vs. religion, or evolution vs. creation (or more recently Intelligent Design). The characters retire; the arguments never do.

At least in the UK there are some people who have embraced the Metaphysics of Quality and have established a website of that name. I find this interesting for several reasons. First, England at least up until recently, had a better educational system, and perhaps the English admirers of Pirsig have been beneficiaries of the British classical education. A second reason is a little more depressing: perhaps Americans don’t really believe, deep down, that one of their own could produce work of the highest quality, especially in something like philosophy. The intellect here has not mellowed into the courtesy of intelligence; it is still too raw and full of itself. In America intellect is always proving itself, and because it always has to fight so many demons, real and imagined, it never really has had to renovate itself, challenge itself by going into the roots of thought. The resulting intellectual stagnation leads to a kind of deviousness in our political life. [[1]] Pirsig is simple, honest and direct in his persona, disarming, unaffected, and apparently not in the quest for academic honors, tenure, or having his best selling book made into a movie. And on top of it all -- a motorcycle trip! It’s enough to make an American intellectual sneer – as sadly, many of them have.

The value of metaphysics is that it forces a confrontation with one’s basic beliefs, and therefore, with one’s strategies for deviousness. It seeks to suspend or disrupt that which is purely automatic in us. According to Ortega y Gasset, metaphysics has to do with the sphere of fundamental beliefs. [[2]] He noted that the original word for philosophy, as practiced in the mystery-schools of the Sophists and Presocratics, aletheia, the unveiling or “truth-finding process,” was too unsettling and uncomfortable for people, and in the later classical age Plato and the others came up with a more neutral term, the “love of wisdom.” [3]

Robert Pirsig would find Ortega’s train of thought – going back to the early Sophists and rhetoricians of ancient Greece, very congenial. For he recapitulated the same journey in his quest to overcome what he calls the “Metaphysics of Substance.” This Metaphysics of Substance relates to the primary division, in Western philosophy, between subjects and objects. Only “objects,” that is, things with substantial being, are considered to be objectively real. To Pirsig, it was an artificial dividing line which elevated the rational at the expense of the good. This habit of thinking was detrimental to society, creating chaos in the realm of morals and values. For according to its tenets, those very morals and values lay in the “subjective” side of the equation and therefore culminate solely as expressions of personal preference. [4]

Pirsig’s quest, therefore, led him to make his attack at the very citadel – the subject-object division. More fundamental than a subject which thinks and objects which are thought about is the “Quality” which leads us to postulate the existence of subjects and objects. “…at the cutting edge of time, before an object can be distinguished, there must be a kind of nonintellectual awareness… You can’t be aware that you’ve seen a tree until after you’ve seen the tree…” (ZMM, 250) And: “Reality is always the moment of vision before the intellectualization takes place…Since all intellectuality identifiable things must emerge from this preintellectual reality, Quality is the parent, the source of all subjects and objects.” (251)

It is true that in his original discovery of Quality (“… the continuing stimulus which our environment puts upon us to create the world in which we live,” “Quality is the event at which awareness of both subjects and objects is made possible,” etc.) Pirsig wonders if the mystical Tao of Zen is what he means by the metaphysical “Quality,” and says, yes, This was what he meant all along. But the rapprochement with Zen is of short duration. He finds the kinship, but it is almost too great a burden and in some inexplicable way his mind gives way. On the motorcycle trip with Chris, he recalls this sequence of events from his past. His task is to confront Western philosophy, to battle the ghost of Reason. It is not to proclaim the Tao. His is in the deepest sense a Trinitarian quest.[5]

On the surface, ZMM is an account of a motorcycle trip Pirsig took across the Western states with his son Chris, then about 15. Father and son have their good and difficult moments – the father, as we learn, a survivor of shock treatments, having formerly spent some time on the inside of an insane asylum, and the son having premonitory hints of depression and dysfunction. In company with another couple, John and Sylvia, they begin somewhere in Minnesota and end up in Oregon, with a longer stay en route in Bozeman, Montana where the father used to teach.

The philosophy grows slowly through the book in order to get to Montana and its aftermath, the father’s “nervous breakdown” and commitment. There’s a ghost, Phaedrus, who is actually the name of one of Socrates’ interlocutors in the Platonic dialogue of that name. Phaedrus is the father’s former self, the one who taught rhetoric in the Montana college. He once asked his students to write a 350-word essay answering the question: “What is quality in thought and statement?” This was the first, or “nonmetaphysical” phase of his quest, which he says had to do with his teaching and which could be evaluated on its own terms, apart from his later speculations. His sense of what happened in this phase was that while neither he nor his students could define Quality, they still had an ability to recognize it. Quality could not be defined, but we know that it exists, because without it life would be impossible or unrecognizable. One way of getting at it is to say that Quality is the immediate participatory relation with things. His reflections on Quality are very much in agreement with modern theories of perception, e.g. as R.L. Gregory puts it, in Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing (1966; 1971): “… Objects are far more than patterns of stimulation; [they] have pasts and futures; when we know its past or can guess its future, an object transcends experience and becomes an embodiment of knowledge and expectation without which life of even the simplest kind is impossible.” Quality is the immediate experience, our original familiarity which enables our cognition to become re-cognition. [6]

The very definition of “being dull” or “being square” is the “ inability to see quality before it’s been intellectually defined.” Don’t we all know people like this? Everything has to be spelled out for them. “They have eyes but see not; they have ears but hear not,” as the Bible describes idolatry, which is the term that expresses the absence of participatory relation. The square television screen, apart from what it being shown in it, seems to me to epitomize this “squareness” of the modern mind, which seems to have such difficulty in understanding Quality.

Phaedrus’s teaching career comes to an end when he decides to enroll in the University of Chicago in order to pursue a Ph.D. degree. By that time he has figured out where his philosophical sympathies lie. He has mapped out his territory, scouted the encampments, taken cognizance of the fortifications, and identified his friends and his enemies. Those sympathies are not with Plato and Aristotle but with the ancient rhetoricians, the Sophists, as Plato called them. Phaedrus holds that Plato’s hatred of the Sophists was a part of a much larger struggle – “in which the reality of the Good, represented by the Sophists, and the reality of the True, represented by the dialecticians, were engaged in a huge struggle for the future mind of man. Truth won, the Good lost, and that is why today we have so little difficulty accepting the reality of truth and so much difficulty accepting the reality of Quality, even though there is no more agreement in one area than in the other.” (381)

The argument here becomes very subtle, because there would appear to be a fundamental similarity between Plato’s idea of the Good and Phaedrus’s notion of Quality. Phaedrus acknowledges the significance of the idea of truth, which became the centerpiece in the progressive unfolding of Western science. But a mind grappling with philosophy that it is determined to win anew cannot rest content with platitudes – no matter how true or elevated. Such a mind seeks to become nourished with something akin to a historical imagination. That is to say, it will not merely rest content with what has been gained, but ponder on what might have been lost. What might have been lost in the victory of Plato and Aristotle over the Sophists?

Plato dismissed the Sophists as teachers of “ethical relativism,” but Phaedrus finds this to be a piece of propaganda. The Sophists were concerned with aretê, virtue, or excellence – i.e., “Quality.” Phaedrus finds in the Platonic dialectic – that is, logical argumentation through cross-examination – not a real concern with beauty or wisdom in the sense of understanding, love, or desire to achieve or possess them, but rather a device to install Reason as their usurper—Reason to enthrone itself. “The parvenu, muscling in on all that is Good and seeking to contain it and control it.” Thus Phaedrus

“…began to see for the first time the unbelievable magnitude of what man, when he gained power to understand and rule the world in terms of dialectic, had lost. He had built empires of scientific capability to manipulate the phenomena of nature into enormous manifestations of his own dreams of power and wealth – but for this he had exchanged an … understanding of what it is to be part of the world, and not an enemy of it.” (387)

The Great Books program at the University of Chicago was inspired by teachers with an Aristotelian bent, and Pirsig-Phaedrus enters the lists with the intention of doing battle. This is a highly dramatic turn in the book’s closing sections, which I will leave the reader to explore on his own. [7]

In the next section of this paper I want to bring the discussion up to date by discussing how the division of classical metaphysics into subjects/objects plays into our global economic mindset. In particular I will discuss Pirsig’s book, Lila, with the following question in mind: what difference to one’s view of the world if we begin to interpret it in terms of Quality? I hope to show that Pirsig’s terminology of Quality and its ramifications in biology, social theory and the intellectual life provides a real key for understanding many of our present difficulties.

For if it is true, as Pirsig argues, that subject-object metaphysics is an unsatisfactory way of doing metaphysics, its persistence as the dim ground of unconscious values, assumptions and presuppositions must in the end have dire consequences. Pirsig argues that the Metaphysics of Quality can adequately account for subjects and objects. But the converse is not true: a subject-object metaphysics cannot account for Quality. That is, it can accord no compelling abode for values. If everything objective is merely an extension of “substance,” where do values lie? Thus there is the absurdity of trying to assign “values” to some region of the brain, as if their assignment to a real physical location would somehow grant them real existence.

But the subject-object metaphysics has been plagued throughout its history with many interminable debates of this kind: free will vs. determinism, mind vs. matter, causation, the apparent purposeless of the universe, reality vs. appearances, fact vs. values. In a substance-centered view, ethics and morals can have no real presence in the face of the mechanical forces of nature. Thus a purely deterministic outlook comes to occupy the mind. It is one thing when this determinism is purely philosophical. It is another thing altogether when it becomes the ruling value-set of those who wield economic and political power.

This is the thesis of John McMurtry’s 2002 book, Value Wars: The Global Market versus the Life Economy. McMurtry, a Canadian Professor of Philosophy, examines the assumptions of the globalist neoliberal or New World Order doctrine in terms of its “unseen moral syntax.” He writes,

“The profound metaphysical error…occurs when the believer supposes that whatever is not validated by scientific method does not exist. This is a dogma which has penetrated the very grammar of modern thought… [The] implications are not widely recognized; yet, eliminate choice at this a priori level, do so as a given principle of scientific method, generalize its structure of understanding to market demand and state policy formation, and you have the master assumption of the totalitarian value-set – that
no real choice exists…”[8]

McMurtry thus speaks the language of Pirsig when he writes that “Lines of force follow lines of value.” [9]The trajectory from a philosophical activity of severing the world’s reality into objective and subjective components to this “triumphal economic fatalism” is of course a complex history comprising many elements extraneous to pure philosophy. Nevertheless, that an habitual cast of philosophy issues into a “global cosmology of determinism” [10] which is completely at odds with the spirit that traditionally animated Western philosophical activity, is a remarkably forceful illustration of the processes of intellectual inversion and decay. A modern philosophical tradition incapable of apprehending values has been rear-ended, so to speak, by an economic regime which has covertly incorporated a set of values which remain non-discussable and outside the realm of discourse.

But examples of intellectual decay in Western societies are all around us. In Lila Pirsig takes the tool of Quality, develops it further, and uses the insights thus gained to examine the conditions of society. The story ostensibly develops as a boat-trip down the Hudson River, in which the solitary Pirsig-Phaedrus finds himself as the ferryman for Lila, a young and confused woman to whom he is simultaneously attracted and repelled. He is attracted because Lila undoubtedly has “biological Quality.” She’s sexy. He is repelled because she is confused, she doesn’t know who she is, and intellectually, she’s nowhere.

Lila’s particular quality or lack thereof form the backdrop for the continuing clarification in Pirsig’s mind regarding the Metaphysics of Quality. He reaches an important moment, which he confides to the reader with characteristic understatement, that came “after many months of thinking about it.” It is the reward of two terms: dynamic good and static good. “Not subject and object but static and dynamic is the basic division of reality.” Dynamic Quality is the cutting edge, the force in life that leads to betterment. But life cannot exist on pure Dynamic Quality alone: “Without Dynamic Quality the organism cannot grow. Without static quality the organism cannot last. Both are needed.”

This is the germinal idea that leads him to a new understanding of evolution, which is not just a forward movement. Rather, every dynamic advance has to be followed by a stabilizing hold or “static latch.” Unless the dynamic movement forward can be encapsulated by the static latch, the gain will not be permanent, and deterioration or reversion will set in. In the history of life this dynamic-static conversation can be seen in how the static molecule, protein, surrounds and protects the dynamic DNA. All biological and higher forms show this static-dynamic pattern, from semi-permeable cell walls that protect the dynamic interior process of the cell to “bones, shell, hide, fur, burrows, clothes, houses, villages, castles, rituals, symbols, laws, and libraries. All of these prevent evolutionary degeneration.” With this insight he has undercut the materialism from the Darwinian evolutionary idea and freed it to become a usefully (dynamic) concept. Life is the response to Quality, on whatever level of discourse it may be. And human society, too, can be understood in a new and non-reductive way as a taking account of static and dynamic quality.

It seems to me very sad that people in America who are resisting the aggressive (and regressive) influence of Darwinian materialism – a resistance I thoroughly support - seem not to have any acquaintance with Pirsig’s interpretation of the evolutionary scenario. Pirsig’s approach does not derive from religion but it is compatible with it, as indeed it is also compatible with science. To miss such an opportunity for creative development and social rapprochement on this divisive issue in American life seems to me a telling commentary on the fragmented intellectual life of our time and the lack of dialogue among different segments of society. Pirsig’s views would be dismissed by scientists and anti-Darwinians alike, though for different reasons. The causes for such stiff-necked incuriosity and willful intellectual isolation can be found, but they are ultimately not very interesting. What is interesting is when people begin to demand Quality in thinking, i.e., when they have grown tired of an endless debate framed in trivializing and demeaning terms, and seek to transcend it by acquiring a new and more generous framework for understanding it. [11]

By this point Pirsig’s reflections have brought him to a four-fold division of Quality, namely, inorganic, biological, social, and intellectual. These four levels refer to the following domains:

Inorganic: laws of nature, expressing the conquest of inorganic patterns over chaos

Biological: Biology over the inorganic, “law of the jungle,” power, lust, sex, etc.

Social: Social patterns over biology; law; manners; civilizing customs, restraints, catechisms, arts, etc.

Intellectual: Response to Quality as desire for truth, love of liberty in the realm of thought and opinion, creative expression and inspiration

What is new in his thinking, he says, is that he sees these four levels as discrete and non-continuous. Inorganic value patterns (matter or substance) underlie all the others. But the biological, social and intellectual patterns, while dependent upon the inorganic substrate, have rules and patterns of their own that are not derivable from the inorganic pattern. To the degree that “matter” obeys inorganic patterns and “mind” follows intellectual ones, the old mind vs. matter duality is correct. But what is missing in that paradigm is the intervening levels, the biological and the social. Ideas are not generated from inorganic patterns. They arise out of society, which has arisen out of biology. And as Pirsig remarks, “The intellectual level of patterns, in the historic process of freeing itself from its parent social level, namely the church, has tended to invent a myth of independence from the social level for its own benefit. Science and reason, this myth goes, come only from the objective world, never from the social world. The world of object imposes itself upon the mind with no social mediation whatsoever…But a close examination shows it isn’t so.” [12]

Pirsig argues that the main feature of life in the 20th century is the attempt by intellect to dominate society. Insofar as this intellectual dominancy is a response to Quality he favors it. But his valuation is nuanced because of his deepening sense for the importance of static quality. “This has been a century of fantastic intellectual growth and fantastic social destruction,” he comments.[13] The causes of this fantastic social destruction are not hard to find. Modern intellectuals have preponderantly upheld the values of biology at the expense of the social. The intellectual pattern of amoral objectivity “… is to blame for the social deterioration of America, because it has undermined the static social values necessary to prevent deterioration. In its condemnation of social repression as the enemy of liberty, it has never come forth with a single moral principle that distinguishes a Galileo fighting social repression from a common criminal fighting social repression. It has, as a result, been the champion of both. That’s the root of the problem.” [14]

Pirsig believes that the Victorian era was the last period in which intellectual values had been subordinated to social values. A Minnesota native, of German descent, Pirsig grew up in the era of declining Victorian social values, that is, the period in which the white Protestant ascendancy was on the wane. The First World War signified the collapse of Victorian social values. The election of Woodrow Wilson to the presidency of the United States marked the shift from social domination of intellect to the intellectual domination of society. “Before Wilson’s time… intelligence and knowledge were considered a high manifestation of social achievement, but intellectuals were not expected to run society itself… They were expected to decorate the social parade, not lead it.” [15] The domination of intellect over society came to a further stage with Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal. The New Deal was billed as a program for working people, farmers, and laborers, but it was really a new deal for the intellectuals. “Suddenly, before the old Victorians’ eyes, a whole new social caste, a caste of intellectual Brahmins, was being created above their own military and economic castes.”

I can attest to some of these feelings of resentment and bewilderment. My grandfather, Forney Johnston, an attorney, was a vehement opponent of the New Deal, and fought it all the way to the Supreme Court. On the other side of the fence in those days – Birmingham, Alabama in the fifties and sixties – I recall the glowing attitudes toward Roosevelt by some of those ex-New Dealers who had become racial liberals and integrationists. For them, being in Roosevelt’s Washington was like the early Wordsworth’s paean to the French Revolution – “Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive.” Wordsworth, I think, repented. But the New Dealers never did.

Pirsig, still on the track of the Metaphysics of Quality, begins to see how the tools of the intellectuals – cultural relativism, objectivity, value-free science, etc., became “a ferocious instrument for the dominance of intellect over society.” Thus:

“From the perspective of a subject-object science, the world is a completely purposeless, valueless place. There is no point in anything. Nothing is right and nothing is wrong. Everything just functions, like machinery. There is nothing wrong with being lazy, nothing morally wrong with lying, with theft, with suicide, with murder, with genocide. There is nothing morally wrong because there are no morals, just functions.

“Now that the intellect was in command of society for the first time in history, was this the intellectual pattern it was going to run society with?” [16]

Finally, of particular interest to me and my coming-of-age, I appreciated Pirsig’s comment that the Hippie movement was the real moral movement and that the present period (he was writing in the 1990’s) represents the real collapse of values. For it was that decade that saw the rise of neoconservatism, that toxic mix of decayed social value combined with biological value -- pseudo-Victorianism combined with the glorification of force. The Hippies, said Pirsig, having rejected both social and intellectual patterns, were “left [with] just two directions to go: towards biological quality and towards Dynamic Quality.” This statement very accurately summarizes my feelings and apprehensions of this period, which of course at the time, were not altogether conscious. But, he continues, “The revolutionaries of the sixties thought that since both are antisocial, and since both are anti-intellectual, … then they must both be the same thing. That was the mistake.” [17]

A big mistake, and it was a mistake of such magnitude that American society has never recovered and in fact is still dealing with the consequences of its refusal to face it. The direction I took, somehow nebulously on behalf of Dynamic Quality, were framed more in the sense of a rejection of the Hippies and embrace of conservatism. And yet I found myself often irritated by conservative put-downs of the Hippies.[18] The kind of Hippie I meant wasn’t a tenured radical, nor was it someone who became mired in the mud of Woodstock. The Hippie movement for me was folk music, community, social values, spiritualizing the intellect, being a good mom, living with less, and not worshipping the Mammonite god which was hollowing out America and turning it into a gigantic shopping mall. That kind of Hippie was in search of Dynamic Quality, and I was delighted to find in Robert Pirsig – the hippie motorcyclist with a passion for Quality in thinking – the very understanding of just what it was I felt back in those days.

[1] See in this regard Michael Kinsley’s essay, “Election Day,” (New York Times, Nov. 5, 2006) – “In my view, the worst form of cheating in American democracy today is intellectual dishonesty. The conversation… is dominated by disingenuousness. Candidates and partisan commentators strike poses of outrage that they don’t really feel, take positions that they would not take if the shoe was on the other foot…, feel no obligation toward logical consistency… When we vote after a modern political campaign run by expensive professionals, we have almost no idea what the victor really believes or what he or she might do in office…”
[2] e.g. “Only the individual who is in a position to question things with precision and urgency – whether they definitely exist or not – is able to experience genuine belief and disbelief.” The Origin of Philosophy, p. 25. Also his: “To realize or be aware of something without counting on it is the most characteristic form of an idea; to count on something without realizing it, is the most characteristic form of a belief.” From his Historical Reason, p. 21. Along these lines, the American philosopher C.S. Pierce daringly challenged the notion of the autonomy of reason when he remarked, in his essay, “How to Make Our Ideas Clear,” that “… the production of belief is the sole function of thought.”
[3] This word aletheia, the unveiling, was later translated into an “orientalized” version of the word for the last book of the Bible – Apocalypse.
[4] Alasdair MacIntyre’s After Virtue is compelling treatise that shows how moral incoherence arises from the subject-object metaphysics. He argues for a return to Aristotelian teleology but he does not address the fundamental incoherence of modern metaphysical assumptions.
[5] Pirsig is not of a religious disposition, but neither is he opposed to religion. In discovering Quality, he says, he was following a path that, to his knowledge, had never been taken before in Western thought – a path that “went straight between the horns of the subjectivity-objectivity dilemma and [that] said Quality is neither a part of mind, nor is it a part of matter. It is a third entity which is independent of the two. “ (240) When he has this realization, “He was heard along the corridors and up and down the stairs of Montana Hall singing softly to himself, almost under his breath, ‘Holy, holy, holy… blessed Trinity.’” Because Quality is the generator of the mythos, the primary perceptual response to the world, “Religion isn’t invented by man. Men are invented by religion. Men invented responses to Quality, and among these responses is an understanding of what they themselves are.” .
[6] The passage begins: “The seeing of objects involves many sources of information beyond those meeting the eye… It generally involves knowledge of the object derived from previous experience, and this experience is not limited to vision but may include the other senses: touch, taste, smell, hearing and perhaps also temperature and pain.” Interestingly, one of Pirsig’s examples for an immediate experience of Quality would be “sitting on a hot stove,” i.e. “temperature and pain.” Concerning the strict Cartesian breach between subjects and objects, John Lukacs quotes a Professor Ogg who said of Descartes, that "“.. he insisted on eliminating the mental processes which can be linked with bodily functions, such as imagination and memory. Childhood he regarded as merely a period of error…” Lukacs, Historical Consciousness, (1968) p. 237.
[7] In Lila Pirsig recounts the story of his meeting with Robert Redford, an admirer of ZMM, who was visiting on behalf of a Hollywood interest in doing the book as a movie. Redford had the idea of beginning the movie in one of these classroom encounters where Phaedrus aims the fatal rhetorical blow at the professor – “[who] has never confronted a living Sophist. Only dead ones.” Pirsig appreciated Redford’s interest but declined to sell the rights to Hollywood.
[8] Value Wars, 102-3.
[9] E.g., “The Metaphysics of Quality says that if moral judgments are essentially assertions of value and if value is the fundamental ground-stuff of the world, then moral judgments are the fundamental ground-stuff of the world.” Lila, 180.
[10] As an example of deterministic thinking, McMurtry quotes former Prime Minister Tony Blair: “These forces of change driving the future don’t stop at national boundaries. Don’t respect tradition. They wait for no one and no nation. They are universal.” Remarks of Tony Blair at National Labour Convention, 1999.
[11] “That’s the mark of a high-quality theory. It doesn’t just answer the question in some complex round-about way. It dissolves the question, so you wonder why you ever asked it.” Lila, p. 186.
[12] The disdain in conservative circles for Thomas Kuhn’s book, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, which argued for the important role of social mediating patterns in the formation of scientific theories, was palpable. According to James Franklin, writing in the New Criterion in 2000, “… the worst effect of Kuhn … has been the frivolous discarding of the way things are as a constraint on the theory about the way things are.” Granted, the liberal cultural theorists had already managed to trash Kuhn’s message and turn it into a tract for historical relativism. But the conservatives could have scolded Kuhn’s followers as an unfortunate phenomenon without also engaging in their own form of trashing the book. Kuhn's book was an important marker of how a deepening historical consciousness was beginning to penetrate to the field of science.
[13] Lila, 190.
[14] Lila, p. 351. Pirsig’s example of Galileo is singularly inapt – pace Robert Sungenis, Arthur Koestler, and others who have examined the truth of the Galileo affair – nevertheless his point is well taken. Cf. also: “… when the intellectuals in control of society take biology’s side against society then society is caught in a cross fire from which it has no protection.” The late Norman Mailer is a case in point. See Roger Kimball’s essay, “Norman Mailer, A Dissenting View, on “Roger’s Rules” website (Nov. 10, 2007): “ Many critics believe that The Executioner’s Song (1979) is Mailer’s best book. Subtitled A True Life Novel, it tells the In Cold Blood-type story of the arrest and execution by firing squad of Gary Gilmore, a psychopathic killer who spent most of his thirty-odd years in jail. Written in a clipped, unembellished style, the book contains some of Mailer’s most urgent and compelling prose. Considered as a moral document, however, The Executioner’s Song is profoundly repulsive. For Mailer does not simply delve into and display the humanity of the tortured killer he wrote about: He offers him up as a kind of hero, a courageous “outsider” who deserves our sympathy as a Victim of Society and our respect as an implacable rebel…” The whole review is worth reading as Kimball correctly diagnoses the war of intellectuals against social Quality or values – Pirsig’s exact point.
[15] Lila, p. 309.
[16] Lila, p. 317.
[17] Lila, p. 348.
[18] E.g. Midge Decter’s snide comment that the Hippies were children who “refused to be tested.”


Tom Blair said...

Caryl - how nice to know someone else who enjoyed this book.
I read it in the summer of 1971 - between my junior and senior years at Penn.

2 observations)

1) The word "quality" as Pirsig (and you) use it implies an absolute standard - apart from the oberver. It is a value judgement.

2) There are 2 definitions of quality - apparently independent. There is quality (as you intend it) - e.g. goodness, And there is quality meaning "attribute of." It is the first definition that Pirsig deals with.


psybertron said...

Hi Caryl, just added you to my blogroll. A promising looking blog.

Pirsigian Quality is a major theme of my blog since 2001. In some sense it's the whole theme, but it's not organised so that explicit Pirsigian references are apparent other than through searching and browsing.

My equivalent of your introductory essay, is a very naive paper I did for the Liverpool conference in 2005.

Paper here.
My Pirsig Pages here
Blog here

Regards, Ian

seev said...

Thank you for your excellent introduction to Pirsig's philosophy. I've been working hard the last couple days trying to understand it. Maybe I should read ZMM and Lila before commenting, but I did read Pirsig's Metaphysics of Quality by McWatt, and Cruising Blues and Subjects, Objects, Data and Values by Pirsig online, plus some other online things on MOQ. I think I'm beginning to get the idea of his philosophy.

It does bother me that in your quotes from Lila, Pirsig seems to characterize the New Deal as "a caste of intellectual Brahmins" and "a ferocious instrument for the dominance of intellect over society." Why could not the New Deal be looked upon as a static implementation of "Dynamic Quality"? After all, it introduced a totally new way of helping society. And I'm still being helped by Social Security as are millions of other Americans. I suppose he would consider the European welfare states ferocious instruments? Ok, maybe I'm reading more into it than is there.

Caryl said...

Hi Seev,
Thanks for your kind and encouraging comment. It's interesting, a friend of mine also picked up on the negative attitude toward the New Deal. Whatever the problems of that era may have been, what we have now (complete abdication of social responsibility on the part of the State) is much worse. I think that what Pirsig was trying to get at was the insufficient understanding of social value or Quality on the part of intellectual elites, an attitude which played into "statist" solutions. In any case, his important point was that modern intellectuals have not supported social values out of a misreading of the intellectual value of autonomy. This still seems to be the case today. Combine that with statist bureaucracy and you get a real mess! This is apparently what we have today - with the positive and beneficial aspects of the New Deal completely thrown overboard.
You have raised an interesting question about the European welfare state model. I think Pirsig might reply that there has been historically a greater sense for social quality in Europe, which has been better able to withstand the depredations of a financialist elite with no stake in the well-being of society. See my post of today (12/22) Best regards,CJ

seev said...

Thanks, CJ, for your thoughtful comment on my comment. It's certainly true that in FDR's time there may have been a danger of "statism" taking hold, but perhaps the presence of vigorous opponents like your grandfather prevented this, although there are also those who say that FDR saved the country from a communist revolution. I certainly agree with you that today in America the positive aspects of the New Deal have been under attack for last three decades. Anti-tax has been the mantra for some time, and as you say, the financialist elite are in danger of taking over here, and may already have. How would Pirsig handle this?

Caryl said...

Hi Seev, Thanks again for replying. I think the anti-tax movement is part of our major fault as a society, that is, the refusal to recognize and sustain a good quality social order. We seem to think that the values of civilization will just take care of themselves. Pirsig's analysis of static social quality and how important it really is, is a major tool to get our thinking moving in a better direction and prodding us our of complacency in this regard.

Anonymous said...


Matt K said...

I'd cede you your politics (though I'd even disagree with Seev's concession about statism: I don't think there was ever a time in US history that there was a real possibility, unless you count the almost-coup of FDR that W Bush's grandpa, Prescott Bush, was involved in): they are more complex than mine to understand easily, though we certainly look at the world a bit differently (I'm as typical a non-Marxist, reformist leftist as they come).

But I think your attitude to MacIntyre in fn4 is a little short: "he does not address the fundamental incoherence of modern metaphysical assumptions." This strikes me as pretty much only true if one first grants that Pirsig is pretty much the only philosopher to have found the fundamental incoherence of modern metaphysical assumptions. As far as I can tell, MacIntyre is addressing almost exactly the same set of phenomena, though his route through and end points are different. In fact, it's difficult not to feel that MacIntyre may have undercut Pirsig's program, because MacIntyre points at the dissolution of the community in modern society, whereas the tenor of Pirsig's writings is still the typical, Emersonian individualism that I think MacIntyre would count as a function of the Enlightenment project, and so emotivism.

At the very least, I don't think one can so easily dismiss MacIntyre's deep penetration into the metaphysical assumptions of modern philosophy (or culture), even if what is discerned as the major root cause is a little different. What would be fruitful is a rapprochement between the two.

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

Practice what you preach.............................................................

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

No pains, no gains..................................................................

家唐銘 said...


Anonymous said...

很用心的部落格 路過留言支持 ................................................

Anonymous said...

Some people cannot see the wood for the trees.............................................................

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...


于庭吳 said...


Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...


Unknown said...

Watch Online Live Dragon Ball Z Remastered / Uncut 9 Season 291 Episode and Sagas Watch At On Link

Diann Blakely said...

Bliss indeed, if I can find you. I, too, am a descendant of the Thoroughbred Colt. He is the "forebear" in a manuscript of poems I'm writing: RAIN IN OUR DOOR: DUETS WITH ROBERT JOHNSON. Greil Marcus, Peter Guralnick, DEAR MASTER, the Coyle dissertation, and you have lit the way on a crossroads that has, at times, seemed "dark as night."

Diann Blakely

Arvind Jangid said...

Nice Post !

Unknown said...

Oh! Superb post. Really this site is incredibly ready to lend a hand for all concerning this. I got hardly any important helps from here and very recommended it. Definitely I will be familiar with my relatives and relevant competitors concerning this blog and will wait for more. Thanks a lot…….

Unknown said...

Really rich content and very useful information. I found my problem’s solution starting at this point. I exceedingly advocate his/her machinery by means of the valuable enlightening information. Thanks a lot………..mailing tubes

psybertron said...

Hi CJ,
I know you've moved on from this blog, but all the comments since 2010 (except Matt's) are fake / spam. You should probably clean them out and switch commenting off, if you want to preserve the original content.


nonzero said...

>"Aside from the business craze for “Total Quality Management” which swept America in the 80’s, and then embarked to Japanese corporations – a craze which may or may not have owed something to Pirsig’s discoveries"

TQM started in Japan and was imported into the US, not the other way around. And TQM doesn't bear much similarities to Pirsig's Quality, it has more to do with efficiency.

> "This is the germinal idea that leads him to a new understanding of evolution, which is not just a forward movement. Rather, every dynamic advance has to be followed by a stabilizing hold or “static latch.”

This is the foundational idea of the non-academic philosophical works of Ken Wilber's Integral movement. It also underpins the more recent 'Evo-Devo Universe' ideas of John Smart et al. Not to mention Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, or modern biologists like Simon Morris Conway (though I take issue with their religiosity).

As for my explanation for why the subject/object dichotomy has persisted and morphed into the dominant 'greedy reductionist' objective worldview, I give at least three major reasons:

1.) Formalization/Mathematization gives the illusion of epistemological certainty, but in the process omits the parts of the world that cannot be formalized (at least not yet). This led to the dominance of analytical philosophy and logical positivism, which pervades almost all of modern intellectual thinking. Read Nassim Taleb for his recent criticism sof this error of modernity.

2.) Abandoning teleology completely instead of updating it into teleonomy. Francis Bacon removed formal and final causes from our epistemological repertoire, the Enlightenment thinkers codified this error, and Darwin solidified it. This led to the moral relativism (implicit or explicit) that dominates modern intellectual thinking. Complexity science has much to offer us in reintroducing these causes, but progress is slow and met with hostility.

3.) Subjective experiences, or in the terminology of the philosophy of mind, 'qualia', have not been amenable to scientific methodologies. This has led to the outright dismissal of such a thing and the rise of the dominant eliminative materialism of scientists and philosophers who research neuroscience and consciousness (Daniel Dennett et al). This has also dominated most of social science until very recently, as the hyperrational model of homo economicus has been the axiom for which most thinking is based on. I think we can trace this back to Alan Turing and his Turing Test, and Von Neumann's game theory. Recent economic failures which have led to behavioral economics and more psychologically accurate social science is a step in the right direction, Reintroducing qualia on scientific grounds is very hard, but I believe it would pave the way for revolutionary advances in cognitive science as well as cosmology (to make a bold prediction).

Unknown said...

شركة غسيل خزانات بالرياض
غسيل خزانات
شركة عزل خزانات بالرياض
شركات عزل الاسطح
شركة عوازل
شركة عزل مائي
شركات العزل الحراري

Unknown said...

شركة كشف تسربات بالرياض
شركة تسليك مجارى بالرياض
شركة تنظيف بيارات بالرياض
شركة نقل اثاث بالرياض

تخزين اثاث
شركة رش مبيدات بالرياض

شركة مكافحة حشرات بالرياض

شركة تنظيف خزانات بالرياض

شركة عزل خزانات بالرياض

كشف تسربات المياه

شركة تنظيف فلل بالرياض

شركة تنظيف مجالس بالرياض

تسليك مجارى

شركة تنظيف موكيت بالرياض

Unknown said...

شركة تنظيف شقق بالرياض

شركة تنظيف منازل بالرياض

شركة تنظيف بيارات بالرياض
شركة عزل اسطح بالرياض
شركة تنظيف مسابح بالرياض
شركة تنظيف كنب بالرياض
شركة جلى بلاط بالرياض
شركة تنظيف بالرياض
شركة نقل اثاث بالمدينة المنورة
افضل شركة تنظيف منازل بالمدينة المنورة
شركة تنظيف شقق بالرياض
شركة تنظيف بالدمام

Unknown said...

شركات تنظيف بالدمام
شركه تنظيف خزانات بالدمام
شركة تنظيف بمكة
شركه نقل اثاث بمكة
شركة مكافحة حشرات بمكة
شركة نقل اثاث بجدة
شركة تنظيف فلل بالدمام
شركة نقل اثاث بالدمام
شركات تنظيف بالدمام
مستودعات تخزين الاثاث بالرياض
شركة نقل عفش بالرياض
شركات نقل عفش بالرياض
نقل اثاث رخيص
شركة تخزين اثاث
شركات نقل عفش في الرياض
تخزين عفش بالرياض

Unknown said...

نقل عفش داخل الرياض
شركة كشف تسربات بالرياض
شركة عزل خزانات بالرياض
شركة تنظيف خزانات
شركة تسليك مجارى
شركة رش مبيدات بالرياض
مكافحة حشرات بالرياض
تنظيف موكيت بالرياض
تنظيف فلل بالرياض
شركة تنظيف مجالس بالرياض
افضل شركة نظافة بالرياض
شركة تنظيف بيوت بالرياض
شركة تنظيف بالرياض
شركة تنظيف شقق بالرياض

شركة تنظيف منازل بالرياض

Unknown said...

احسن شركة تنظيف بالرياض
شركة تنظيف موكيت بالرياض
شركة شفط بيارات الرياض
تركيب خزانات مياه بولى إيثيلين بالرياض
شركة كشف تسربات المياه بالرياض
شركة عزل خزانات بالرياض

Unknown said...

شركات تنظيف خزانات بالرياض
شركة تنظيف خزانات بالرياض
افضل شركة تنظيف خزانات بالرياض
شركات عزل مائي
شركات كشف تسربات بالرياض
شركة عزل اسطح بالرياض
خزانات الفيبر جلاس
شركات عزل خزانات بالرياض
افضل شركه لتسليك المجاري
افضل شركة لعزل الابوكسي للخزانات


Unknown said...

شركة تنظيف بالرياض
شركة تنظيف منازل بالرياض
شركة تنظيف فلل بالرياض
شركة تنظيف خزانات بالرياض
شركة رش مبيدات بالرياض
شركات رش مبيدات بالرياض
شركة مكافحة حشرات بالرياض
شركات مكافحة حشرات بالرياض
شركة كشف تسربات المياه بالرياض
شركة تنظيف مجالس بالرياض
شركة جلى بلاط بالرياض
شركة تنظيف واجهات زجاج بالرياض
شركة تنسيق حدائق بالرياض
شركة دهانات بالرياض
شركة عزل اسطح بالرياض
شركة نقل اثاث بالرياض
شركة تنظيف بالرياض
شركة جلى بلاط بالرياض

Phone: 0555618071


Unknown said...

شركة تنظيف بالرياض
شركة نظافة بالرياض
شركات تنظيف بالرياض
شركات نظافة بالرياض
شركة تنظيف منازل بالرياض
شركة نظافة منازل بالرياض
شركات تنظيف منازل بالرياض
شركة تنظيف شقق بالرياض
شركة نظافة شقق بالرياض
شركات تنظيف شقق بالرياض
شركة تنظيف خزانات بالرياض
شركات تنظيف خزانات بالرياض
شركة نظافة خزانات بالرياض
شركات نظافة خزانات بالرياض
شركة رش مبيدات بالرياض
شركة مكافحة حشرات بالرياض
شركة كشف تسربات المياه بالرياض

Unknown said...

I'll just bookmark this web site.

Unknown said...

منصتك الاخبارية said...

منصتك الاخبارية said...

Unknown said...

شركة مكافة حشرات بالرياض
شركة تنظيف بالرياض الصفرات
شركة الصفرات للتنظيف بالرياض
شركة مكافحة حشرات بالرياض الصفرات
شركة الصفرات للتنظيف يالرياض
شركة الصفرات لتنظيف بالرياض ان شركة وادى الرياض من اكفا الشركات حتى الان اننا نعمل بكل جهد ونشاط لاسعاد عملينا حتى نمتاز عن باقى الشركات اخى العزيز اننا نعمل فى كافة المجلات حتى الان ولا يوجد منافس لدينا لدينا العمالة المطلوبة والصحيحة وكل شىء تجدة انشاء الله عندنا ان هذة الشركة شركة ممتازة وخصوصا فى التنظيف والمكافحة وكشف تسربات المياة ولدينا ايضا شركة نقل اثاث بالرياض ان شركة نقل اثاث بالرياض الصفرات
هى اهم الشركات لدينا ونحافظ على هذة الثمعة على مر السنوات الماضية حتى لايتكلم احد عنها بغير شكل غيرلائق الشركة الرسمية هى شركة وادى الرياض والتى يعرف عنها الكثير والكثير اننا والحمد الله نعمل من اجلك فقط
شركة تنظيف كنب بالرياض الصفرات
شركة الصفرات لتنظيف الكنب بالرياض شركة الصفرات لتنظيف السجاد بالرياض
شركة تنظيف سجاد بالرياض الصفرات
شركة الصفرات لرش مبيدات بالرياض
شركة رش مبيدات بالرياض
شركة تنظيف بالرياض
شركة رش مبيدات بالرياض الصفرات

Unknown said...

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
شركة وادى الرياض تقدم بعض اعماله لكى الكل يعرف شركاتنا واننا نعمل من اجل العمل الرائع الذى يصعب على اى شركة اخرة ونبداء بشركة
شركة تنظيف بجازان
شركة تنظيف بجازان من المناطق الصعبة وذاتة حرارة كبيرة جدا ويصعب على اى شركة تبقى فهذا المكان الحار الصعب غير شركة وادى الرياض
شركة مكافحة حشرات بجازان
وكذالك شركة المكافحة اصعب من التنظيف لان المكافحة تحتاج الى المبيدات الازمة ولذالك نستورد المبيدات اللزمة فى رش المبيدات والتى تعمل فى صمت حفاظا على ارواح البشر وخاصة على الاطفال عزيزى العميل انتا فى ايد امنة فلا تشغل بالك ابدا
شركة مكافحة حشرات بخميس مشيط
مكافحة الحشرات فى خميس مشيط الامر الهام الذى يعنبروة العميل صعبا ولاكن مع شركة وادى الرياض تجد كل شىء سهل فلا تعتل اى هم لذالك من المكافحة او رش المبيدات
شركة تسليك مجارى بالدمام
شركة تسليك مجارى من افضل الشركات حتى هذة اللحظة الحاسمة والتى يعرف عن صعوبة هذا الامر فى مجال التسليك لذالك شركاتنا تنفذ اكبر عمليات التسليك حتى الان
شركة تسليك مجارى بالرياض
افضل شركة تسليك مجارى بالدمام
شركة تنظيف نجران
شركة تنظيف بابها
شركة رش مبيدات بجدة
شركة تنظيف منازل بجدة
شركة مكافحة حشرات بمكة
شركة رش مبيدات بمكة
اننا شركة وادى الرياض نعمل من اجل العميل ولدينا مهارات عالية وعمالة خاصة من او على اعلى مستوى تتخيلة فلا تشغل بالك مهما كان الشىء الذى تطلبة من شركاتنا سواء تنظيف بيتك ولدينا كذا طريقة لنوصل للانتا تريدة وسوفا تكون راضى عن شركة وادى الرياض

رجب البرنس said...

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم نحن فى شركة الكمال نقوم بجميع عزل الخزانات المياه سواء كانت مياة

الشرب او مياه الغسيل كما اننا يوجد لدين خدمة تسليك المجارى بافضل الطرق

شركة عزل خزانات بالطائف

شركة عزل خزانات بجازان

شركة عزل خزانات بحائل

شركة تسليك مجارى بالطائف

شركة تسليك مجارى بجازان

شركة تسليك مجارى بحائل

والسلامة عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته

رجب البرنس said...

شركة الكمال أفضل شركة تنظيف بحائل للتنظيف أهمية كبرى فى حياة الفرد وبالأخص

المواطن السعودى مما
يؤدى ذالك إلى تعرض المنزل بشكل كبير إلى الأتربة والأوساخ والبقع والدهون وأن نظافة

المنزل تشعر الفرد بالراحة
النفسية الكبيرة وتتكفل شركة الكمال بهذا العمل لأنها أفضل

شركة تنظيف بحائل

ولانها الشركة الرائدة
والمشهود لها بالفضلى فى هذا المجال من النظافة لوجود المقومات التى تساعد على ذالك منها

العمالة المدربة وذوى الخبرة
والكفاءة مع وجود أحدث معدات التنظيف للفلل التى تساعد على إنهاء العمل بكفاءة ونهتم كثيرا

بأراء عملائنا فى

شركة تنظيف فلل بحائل

ويقوم طاقم العمل بتنظيف الشقه بدون التسبب بأى إزعاج للعميل فلا تتباطؤ فى إختيار شركة

الكمال لتنظيف منزلكم لأنها أفضل

شركة تنظيف شقق بحائل

ولأن تنظيف المجالس يحتاج إلى وقت وجهد كبير فشركة الكمال أفضل شركة تنظيف
مجالس بحائل كفيلة بتنظيف مجلسك فى أسرع وقت وبدون جهد وبالتالى شركة الكمال هى الحل

الأمثل فى فى مجال تنظيف المجالس
بحائل ونحن بانتظاركم لتتصلوا على

شركة تنظيف مجالس بحائل

وأفضل مايميز شركة العربى أفضل شركة تنظيف منازل بحائل وضعها للخطط قبل البدء فى

العمل وتقسيم طاقمها إلى
مجموعات كل منها مختص بتنظيف جزء معين وتمر عملية التنظيف على عدة مراحل :-
1- البدء بتنظيف الموكيت والكنب والمفروشات والسجاد بالأعتماد على أحدث المعدات

الألكترونية التى تعمل بالبخار لكى
تقضى على المشاكل التقليدية للتنظيف وهى بهتان اللون وبذالك قمنا بالأعتماد على البخار فى

إزالة الأوساخ والبقع
2- ثم بعد ذالك يأتى دور البلاط والأرضيات فيقوم العمال بجلى البلاط والأرضيات بأحدث

ألالآت جلى البلاط والأرضيات

شركة تنظيف واجهات بحائل

شركة الكمال أفضل شركة تنظيف خزانات بحائل نظرا لارتفاع درجات الحرارة فى حائل وفى
غيرها من باقى مدن
المملكة ووجود مياه البحر المحلاة التى تحمل الكثير من الرمال والأتربة مما يؤدى
ذالك إلى تكون الفطريات والجراثيم على
جدران الخزان ويؤدى ذالك إلى تلوث المياه والتى بدورها تؤدى إلى تسمم الفرد إذا فما الحل ؟
الحل تقدمه لكم شركة العربى وهى أفضل
شركة الكمال أفضل (( شركة كشف تسربات المياه بحائل )) نسعى فى شركة الكمال بتقديم كافة

خدمات كشف تسربات المياه ويتم كشف تسربات المياه بأحدث
الأجهزة الألكترونية و طاقم عمل يتكون من فنيين وخبراء منهم فنيين أجانب ونسعى جاهدين

لتقديم أفضل خدمة بأقل سعر وإرضاء العميل واسعارنا حصرية لا تقبل المنافسة لدينا فى

شركة كشف تسربات المياه بحائل

شركة الكمال أفضل (( شركة نقل عفش بحائل )) نقل العفش من الأمور الهامة جدا (( شركة نقل

عفش بحائل )) التى يلزم فبها الدقة والخبرة للحد ولذالك خصصنا قسما فى شركتنا لمجال
نقل العفش مع تجهيزه :-
1- أسطول كبير من السياراة المجهزة والتى (( شركة نقل عفش بحائل )) أعدن خصيصا

لنقل العفش
2- طافم العمل المدرب على حمل وتنزيل العفش والأثاث
3- فنيين متخصصين فى الفك والتركيب (( شركة نقل عفش بحائل ))
ومايجعل نقل الاثاث من أشهر الخدمات التى يكثر عليها الطلب هوا أن معظم العملاء يقومون

بتغيير عفشهم القديم أكثر من مرة فى العام ويرجع ذالك أيضا إلى أنا
العملاء يقومون بتأجير الفلل والقصور والشقق وذالك لأنهم يحبون تغير الجو ولذالك يكون اعتما

نا فى شركة العربى على أحسن تقنيات نقل الاثاث بداخل وخارج
حائل ونقل الاثاث من الأعمال شديدة الكثافة لذا تحتاج إلى

شركة نقل اثاث بحائل

دقة عالية ومهارة فى فك العفش وحمله وإنزاله إلى السياراة وتغليفه لتقليل من شدة الصدمات

تعرضه للكسر وللخدش أيضا ونستخدم فى شركة العربى أفضل وأحدث السيارات المجهزة

خصيصا لنقل العفش

Unknown said...

شركة الصفرات تنظيف الكنب بالرياض
شركة تنظيف خزانات بالدمام
شركة تنظيف المنازل
شركة مكافحة النمل الابيض بجازان
افضل شركة رش مبيدات بمكة
شركة مكافحة الحشرات بمكة
شركة الصفرات لتنظيف بالرياض
شركة الصفرات لتنظيف السجاد بالرياض
يبدء الفريق بتنظيف الواجهات بعناية فائقة وجيدة وبعد الانتهاء من عملية التنظيف وتفحص العميل للعمل يقوم الفريق باعطاء العميل شهادة ضمان وايضا تقدم الشركة متابعة دورية

وهنا يا عزيزى العميل قد وصلنا لنهاية موضوعنا عن شركة تنظيف الواجهات بالدمام, وهذا بعد ان قمت بتوضيح كل شى عن الشركة ولو اردت الاستفسار عن اى شى او حل اى مشكلة تواجهك بالنسبة لتنظيف واجهات زجاج وحجر بالدمام يجب عليك التواصل مع شركة وادى الرياض على الرقم الموحد فى الدمام

كلمات تسهل عليك البحث عن الشركة على الانترنت

شركة الصفرات لمكافحة الحشرات بالرياض

Unknown said...

شركة قمة الدقة للخدمات المنزلية
شركة كشف تسربات المياه بالرياض
شركة كشف تسربات المياه بالخرج
شركة كشف تسربات المياه بالمراحمية
شركة كشف تسربات المياه شمال الرياض
شركة كشف تسربات المياه جنوب الرياض
شركة كشف تسربات المياه غرب الرياض
شركة كشف تسربات المياه شرق الرياض
كشف تسربات المياه بالرياض
كشف تسربات المياه
شركة كشف تسربات بالرياض
شركة كشف تسربات المياه
شركة كشف تسربات المياه بالرياض
شركة كشف تسربات المياه بالدمام
شركة كشف تسربات المياه بالخبر

لمار للتسويق الالكتروني said...

افضل شركة تنظيف بالرياض

شركة مكافحة حشرات ببريدة

شركة مكافحة النمل الابيض بعنيزة

شركة مكافحة البق بعنيزة

شركة تنظيف ببريده

شركة تسليك مجارى بالقصيم

شركة تسليك مجارى بالرس

شركة تسليك مجارى بالجبيل

شركة تسليك مجارى بالخبر

شركة تسليك مجارى بالقطيف

رواد الحرمين said...

شركة كشف تسربات المياه بالاحساء

شركة عزل اسطح بالدمام

sikat said...

Use this article to increase your knowledge . cara menggugurkan kandungan

Unknown said...

there is no such thing as encryption of the data in your skin, unless your talking about heterochromatin, at which point your argument breaks down.
بلیط هواپیما ارزان

خرید بلیط خارجی

بلیط خارجی

بلیط ارزان هواپیما

بلیط چارتر هواپیما

بلیط چارتر

بلیط پرواز خارجی

پرواز خارجی

قیمت بلیط هواپیما

rehabgad1 said...

Good write-up. I definitely love this site. Keep it up

rehabgad1 said...

Good write-up. I definitely love this site. Keep it up

omar ail said...

Your site is very helpful

mahmood majidi said...

Interesting and amazing how your post is! It Is Useful and helpful for me That I like it very much, and I am looking forward to Hearing from your next
بلیط چارتر
قوانین بلیط چارتر
بلیط چارتر هواپیما
کنسلی بلیط چارتر
بلیط خارجی
خرید بلیط خارجی
قیمت بلیط هواپیما
قیمت بلیط هواپیما داخلی
بلیط ارزان هواپیما
بلیط هواپیما ارزان
خرید بلیط هواپیما
رزرو بلیط هواپیما
بلیط هواپیما

mahmood majidi said...

Thank you very much for sharing this very useful information, I am very happy to have found this information that I have been looking for
رزرو بلیط خارجی
تهیه بلیط پرواز خارجی
بلیط ارزان هواپیما
قیمت بلیط هواپیما ایران ایر
قیمت بلیط هواپیما ماهان
بلیط چارتر هواپیما
خرید بلیط خارجی
بلیط چارتر
بلیط ارزانبلیط هواپیما ارزان
قیمت بلیط
قیمت بلیط هواپیما
خرید بلیط هواپیما

Unknown said...

مجالس نراثيه بالرياض

اجذب المزيد من الزبائن إلى مطعمك من خلال تصاميمه الفريدة من نوعها. نتميز بكوننا من أفضل شركات التصميم الداخلي في الرياض
وتنفيذ ديكور بالرياض وأفضل مصمم تصميم وتنفيذ ديكورات بالرياض - شركة تشطيبات داخلية بالرياض-شركة تشطيبات خارجيه بالرياض-شركة تشطيب فلل بالرياض - اسقف معلقة - جبسنبورد – ارضيات
شركة ورق جدران بالرياض حيث انها أفضل
شركة مقاولات بالرياض وهي انها افضل
اجذب المزيد من الزبائن إلى مطعمك من خلال تصاميمه الفريدة من نوعها. نتميز بكوننا من أفضل شركات التصميم الداخلي في الرياض
وتنفيذ ديكور بالرياض وأفضل مصمم تصميم وتنفيذ ديكورات بالرياض -
شركة ترميم بالرياض من أفضل شركات الترميم
مقاول عظم بالرياض ومن أفضل شرككات المقاولات
اجذب المزيد من الزبائن إلى مطعمك من خلال تصاميمه الفريدة من نوعها. نتميز بكوننا من أفضل شركات التصميم الداخلي في الرياض
وتنفيذ ديكور بالرياض وأفضل مصمم تصميم وتنفيذ ديكورات بالرياض - شركة تشطيبات داخلية بالرياض-شركة تشطيبات خارجيه بالرياض-شركة تشطيب فلل بالرياض - اسقف معلقة - جبسنبورد – ارضيات
شركة كاميرات مراقبة بالرياض افضل شركة كاميرات
اجذب المزيد من الزبائن إلى مطعمك من خلال تصاميمه الفريدة من نوعها. نتميز بكوننا من أفضل شركات التصميم الداخلي في الرياض
وتنفيذ ديكور بالرياض وأفضل مصمم تصميم وتنفيذ ديكورات بالرياض - شركة تشطيبات داخلية بالرياض-شركة تشطيبات خارجيه بالرياض-شركة تشطيب فلل بالرياض - اسقف معلقة - جبسنبورد – ارضيات
شركة كلادنج بالرياض وافضل واجهات كلادنج
صيانة الحدائق بالرياض

Unknown said...

شركة أعمال جبس بورد بالرياض
شركة تشطيبات داخلية بالرياض-شركة تشطيبات خارجيه بالرياض- شركة تشطيبات بالرياض شركة تشطيب فلل بالرياض -
منتديات اتصل بنا سوف يرد عليكم مهندس ومصمم ديكور بالرياض من أفضل شركة محل ديكور بالرياض متخصص لديه اقتراحات وتخيل لحل مشاكل الديكورات الداخلي للغرف والحمامات وديكورات الفلل لديه خبره في اختيار انسب وافضل الخامات لعرضها عليكم من شركة ديكورات بالريعن الديكور بسلطنة عمانتعد سحر اللمسات افضل شركة ديكور بالرياض
شركة ديكور بالرياض
اسقف معلقة - جبسنبورد – ارضيات
تصميم داخلي لديكور الفلل والقصور والمعارض والمشاغل والمحلات شقق ومنازل وديكورات مكاتب بالرياض وجميع انحاء المملكه
واحدة من الشركات الرائدة في مجال تصميبم الديكــــــــــــور الداخلي في مدينة الرياض, شركة ديكور بالرياض متخصصة في تقديم أضخم خطط المشاريع وخدمات شركة دهان بالرياض تكون افضل شركةالتصميم الداخلي للفلل والديكورات
التصميم الخارجي للفلل بالرياضشركة تنسيق حدائق بالرياض ومن أفضل شركات
انتقي من مجموعتنا الواسعة للتصاميم الخارجية ما يناسبك كالتصاميم المستوحاة من فن العمارةوجميع انواع الديكورات
الإسلامية, أو المتميزة
تصميم مطاعم بالرياض
شركة باركيه بالرياض لانها تتمثل
شركة تشطيب فلل بالرياض من أفضل
بطابع شرق أوسطي و غير ذلك
التصميم الداخلي للمكاتب بالرياض
دعنا نقدم لك تصميمآ داخليآ مبتكرآ لمكتبك الخاص بمساعدة مصممينا من الكيدرا, شركاؤك لتنفيذ أعمالك على أكمل وجه

سحاب said...

خرید آنلاین بلیط هواپیما |

بلیط استاتبول |

بلیط هواپیما لندن |

بلیط چارتر |

خرید بلیط قطار |

بلیط اتویوس |

بلیط هواپیما خارجی |

قیمت بلیط هواپیما داخلی |

سحاب said...

نقاشی ساختمان مدرن
نقاشی منزل مسکونی
 نقاشی ساختمان

MohammadAmin Sadeghi said...

تور لحظه آخری |

تور کیش |

تور مشهد |

تور گرجستان |

تور دبی |

آفر تور استانبول |

تور ارمنستان لحظه آخری |

nadi hamidi said...

دیگر از درد خود خجالت نکشید بهترین روش درمان فیستول| و درمان بواسیر (درمان هموروئید) با لیزر| را درکلینیک نوین| با دکتر علیرضا زارعی| تجربه کنید [Laser hemorrhoid treatment]
Do not be ashamed of your pain The best way to treat fistulas and Heache treatment (Hemorrhoid Therapy) Laser at the New Clinic with Dr. Alireza Zarei

Do not be ashamed of your pain The best way to treat fistulas and Heache treatment (Hemorrhoid Therapy) Laser at the New Clinic with Dr Alireza Zarei [ The best way to treat fistulas]

دیگر از درد خود خجالت نکشید بهترین روش درمان فیستول درمان بواسیر (درمان هموروئید) با لیزر را درکلینیک نوین با دکتر علیرضا زارعی تجربه کنید [Laser hemorrhoid treatment]
Do not be ashamed of your pain The best way to treat fistulas and Heache treatment (Hemorrhoid Therapy) Laser at the New Clinic with Dr Alireza Zarei

بهترین دکتر (پزشک)متخصص بواسیر یا هموروئید|
برای درمان بواسیر به چه پزشکی مراجعه کنیم؟|

Laser fistula treatment
Laser hemorrhoid treatment
کلینیک نوین|

کلینیک نوین لیزر|
نوین کلینیک|

آبسه مقعدی چگونه درمان میشود؟تنهاراه درمان آبسه مقعدی| ،تخلیه آبسه با ایجاد برش روی پوست محل آبسه است که معمولا در موارد آبسه های بزرگ و عمیق بیمار حتما در بیمارستان باید بستری و این عمل در اتاق عمل توسط جراح متخصص شقاق مقعد انجام شود.

کلینیک نوین | درمان بواسیر، هموروئید، شقاق، کیست مویی، زگیل و فیستول با لیزر توسط دکتر متخصص

کلینیک لیزر|دکتر علیرضا زارعی|درمان بواسیر، هموروئید، شقاق، فیستول و کیست مویی

Unknown said...

rehabgad1 said...

Good write-up. I definitely love this site. Keep it up

rehabgad1 said...

Good write-up. I definitely love this site. Keep it up

سحاب said...

برای دریافت مشاوره سئو و بهینه سازی می توانید با اسماعیل سحاب در تماس باشید. اسماعیل سحاب مشاور سئو حرفه ای و یا مشاوره حرفه ای سئو می کند. از جمله خدمات سئو که ایشان ارایه می دهد. به صفحه اول گوگل اوردن کسب و کار شماست.

مشاور سئو(SEO) چیست؟

در پاسخ به این سوال که «مشاور سئو چیست؟ » می توان به صورت ساده این گونه توضیح داد. سئو سایت یک فرایند مستمر ومدون است که بر روی سایت توسط کارشناس سئو انجام می گیرد تا ترافیک صحیح در زمان صحیح و با کاربر صحیح وارد سایت بشوند تا اکشنی از قبیل خرید، دانلود و … در سایت مورد نظر اتفاق بیافتد. کسی که می تواند در تسریع این فرآیند به سایت مورد نظر کمک کند مشاورسئو است.

مشاور سئو کیست؟

در حقیقت مشاور سئو به کسی گفته می شود که متخصص سئو بوده و دارای نمونه کار، سابقه پربار و تجربه گرانی است که می تواند با آنالیز کسب و کار شما، برای رسیدن به ترافیک اورگانیک بالا و در نهایت فروش بیشتر شما را راهنمایی صحیح کند.  توضیحات ذکر شده در بالا یک تعریف کامل از مشاور سئو حرفه ای است.

خدمات سئو یک فرایند مدون و ادامه دار است که باید همیشه ادامه داشته  باشد تا رقبای شما جایگاه فعلی تان را تصاحب نکنند.


مشاوره سئو و بهینه سازی مشاور سئو حرفه ای | مشاوره حرفه ای سئو | خدمات سئو| صفحه اول گوگل

moz shop said...

جراح مغز و اعصاب

moz shop said...

عکاسی صنعتی تبلیغاتی